Copy
Quarterly Newsletter - April 2020

Hi MICSers,


Welcome to the third edition of our Newsletter!

My name is Sasha, and I lead MICS’ work package on dissemination and outreach; and what a strange time it is to be reaching out to you all. 

While Hannah Joyce from River Restoration Centre is going to cover how coronavirus is affecting the MICS case studies, later in this publication, it would be impossible to introduce this edition of our newsletter without at least acknowledging the situation we find ourselves in.

I imagine, like me (typing at my dining room table turned office space) most of you are currently reading this at home, under some form of lockdown. COVID-19 will undoubtedly already have had an impact on many of you; your home and work life, your projects and your people. I hope that these impacts are not too negative, or long-lasting.

Despite the global peculiarities, we at MICS have been continuing our mission to understand and measure impact in citizen science projects; making the most of project coordinators’ availability to connect remotely and discuss what impact means to them.

We hope that their interesting answers will provide you with a welcome distraction.

Stay safe,
Sasha

Earthwatch

New to the project? Stay informed: subscribe to the newsletter

The impact of Covid-19 on MICS
by Hannah Joyce

The MICS team are connecting remotely with the project partners and citizen scientists during the coronavirus lockdown.  In work package 4 we have been having regular tele-conference calls with our MICS case study leads to develop co-design sessions for citizen scientists. We are keeping in regular contact with citizen scientists via email and phone. For example, in the Italian case study, we are designing citizen science questionnaires to learn about volunteer’s knowledge of environmental problems that can be completed at home. We are also investigating the possibility of holding remote citizen science co-design workshops using online platforms. Whilst we cannot meet face-to-face with our citizen scientists, the conversations never stop! Communication is a vital tool in any citizen science project whether it’s face-to-face or virtually, talking is really important for the success of any citizen science project.

Image credit: iStock\mammuth

What have we learnt about impact?
by Sasha Woods

We’ve been interviewing project coordinators about impact; how they define it, measure it and assess it within their projects. We’ve been collecting and analysing their answers, in an effort to better design the platform to suit their needs. You can read a little bit about the projects we’ve been investigating here: https://mics.tools/lab

We have learnt a great deal from speaking to project coordinators, but here are some of the highlights:

Lesson 1: Impact is hard to define
This will come to no surprise to those who have taken an interest in impact, but even just the concept of “impact” is difficult to define. In some citizen science projects, “impact” isn’t mentioned, and the importance of the project is in knowledge creation. Whereas some coordinators consider any change resulting from their project to be an impact, others only see impacts as long-term indirect effects. While it is not for us to say who is right or wrong, it’s important to consider these opinions when developing the MICS platform.

Lesson 2: We measure impact to learn
As many of you involved in different citizen science projects will know, some projects will have work packages and deliverables dedicated to impact; but many don’t. What we wanted to know, was why does measuring the impact of a project matter in any case? We’ve learnt that there is a lot of crossover between a project’s impact and its evaluation: a thorough impact assessment allows projects to see how effective their methodologies are, where opportunities might be, and how best to promote their activities. It also provides an opportunity for learning, so that future projects can be more impactful and successful.

Lesson 3: Projects use different impact assessment methods (with varying levels of success)
Methods of assessing impact vary hugely across the citizen science projects we interviewed: from having no in-house method and not being aware of any formal methodology in the literature; through having a formal in-house method that is too complicated to actually use practically; to using a strict framework such as the Theory of Change. IHE Delft have been exploring published frameworks in an effort to better understand the literature – we’ll have more on that in the next newsletter. For now, it’s clear that a key task for MICS will be to develop a method that suits both impact newbies and experts; we think we’re up to the challenge!

Lesson 4: Impact is important for our volunteers!
Whilst formal impact assessments are often required by citizen science project funders, a lot of project coordinators consider the citizen scientists to be a key audience interested in a project’s impact. This makes sense in terms of sustaining volunteers’ engagement, and is something for MICS to consider when designing the output of the platform: it has to capture the attention and interest of the average citizen scientist, as well as provide enough information to satisfy more formal funding bodies.

Lesson 5: An impact assessment output will have to be both qualitative and quantitative
We asked citizen science project coordinators, “what would a visual representation of impact look like to you?” and – as you can imagine – the answers were as varied as the projects themselves! Some people think of impact as a score out of 10; some people think of it as a heat map; whereas others think of it as more of a story, or collection of experiences. At MICS, we are taking all of this feedback on board, to design an output that will be useful to as many citizen-science projects – their coordinators and volunteers – as possible.

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant Agreement n. 824711. 

 

Facebook
Twitter
Website
Data protection and privacy policy






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
MICS · Mayfield House · 256 Banbury Road · Oxford, OXON OX27DE · United Kingdom

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp